Burma to Latin America (The Anti-Client Nations)

In the blog supported by The Independent a correspondent asks a very interesting question and at the same time points out something very interesting about international politics that actually treads on the belief system at the moment about whether or not our democracies are actually fighting for democracy. In fact they aren't. Latin America is the best continent to get an actual history on the amount of coups backed by the United States in order to place people in power that would make the United States not only financial backers of third world countries; if those countries were one day to decide to cut those strings attached, as placed on Great Britain in 1945 when they asked for financial aid from the U.S. Of course cutting those strings would give ample reason for the United States to attack or sanction a specific government. So basically when the so called "developed" nations decide to fight for democracy in fact the strings attached are that they want those nations thereafter to be major clients in what is now called Globalization or even a better word for Financial Colonization.

Burmese Government Attacks Monks

The Burmese Military Government has been attacking monks and other protesters for a longer time than the national newspapers have been covering the story and suddenly Mr. Gordon Brown doesn't back the regime in its attack against the protesters and there is suddenly a large follow up on this theme of international politics. Is this just going to be another one of those interesting international disagreements where Primeminister of Great Britain goes to war with Burma in order to overthrow the violent government? What happened to diplomatic solutions?